![]() In Qt Creator some, but not all, windows can be hidden by clicking on different positions, so it is easier to clean up the designer screen in C++ Builder. Although the screen resolution I used for C++ Builder was lower, the screen felt less full: in C++ Builder you can hide all windows by clicking the X on top-right of eacht window. I have been using the GUI designer on a 1024x768 resolution for Qt Creator and 800圆00 for C++ Builder. C++ Builder uses the VCL libary, where Qt Creator uses the very different Qt4 libary. In both IDEs, this initial code can be ruthlessly removed.įor GUI applications, the switch from C++ Builder to Qt Creator is hard. When a console application is started, both C++ Builder and Qt Creator show a non-minimal main function. The main advantage of Qt Creator is its superior compiler with 100% (can this be true?) Boost support. After nine years experience with C++ BuilderĪnd working with Qt Creator for about a year, it is time to make a personal comparison.Ībout 20-60%: BCC32.EXE is an unsupported compilerġ00% (can this be true?): G++ is a supported compilerĪdoption after publication of official Cpp0x standardīelow, I discuss the three items I encountered most in detail: writing console applications, writing GUI applications and documentation needed to learn both IDEs.įor console applications, the switch from C++ Builder to Qt Creator is easy, as there are few differences between the IDEs. ![]() ![]() This article is about comparing C++ BuilderĪnd Qt Creator. ( C++) Comparison of C++ Builder and Qt Creator
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |